You have no items in your cart. Want to get some nice things?
Go shoppingFuture Archives · Artist · Interview
The Trophy is an homage to Man Ray, rebuilt as a print. For Yimin Xiang the printing plate is the archive that survives — and disappearance turns out to be a loop.
Yimin Xiang is an artist and researcher completing a PhD at the Glasgow School of Art. His research investigates the intersections of printmaking, archival theory and contemporary visual culture.
The Trophy (2024), a photopolymer print, was shown in New Contemporaries at MIMA in 2026. It belongs to a strand of research in which printing plates — bought, vanished, resurfaced — become the archival bodies of images.
WorkThe Trophy, 2024. Photopolymer print, 76 × 56 cmShownNew Contemporaries, MIMA, 2026BasedGlasgowInstagram@xiangyimin_ · @inaccessibleplace
The conversation
What is the work or body of work you’d most like us to consider for Future Archives?
Archives is the word I can't get around; it has been in almost everything I've made. I'd suggest start with The Trophy. It belongs to one strand of the research rather than summing it up, it's the most compact way in.
What question were you circling when making it?
This piece it's an homage to Man Ray, the metronome with an eye clipped to the pendulum. The question I kept circling was awkward: how do you make an homage that isn't just the same object with your name on it?
Man Ray's piece is a set of instructions. Cut out an eye and attach it to the pendulum. Set the weight to the tempo you want. The object is a procedure, and the part carrying the meaning is the part built to be swapped. So I ran the procedure and swapped it. A smiley badge went where the eye had been. A smiley emoji hasn't meant a smile for years, and instead you judge by who sent it. The badge grins.
The black humour then had to be built, which was the harder problem. Humour depends on timing, and printing gives you none of it. The work here is in reverse. The order of operations is fixed long before anything is visible, and then you commit, by the time the thing exists the decision is weeks old. So the black humour here is engineered upstream, in a process with no room for improvisation. I haven't resolved it. Objects that arrive with a procedure attached are what I keep coming back to, and what happens when somebody else runs the procedure again. A print works the same way.


How does memory, preservation, disappearance or record-keeping sit inside the work?
I guess, as a loop, and I've grown more certain of that recently. In another project The Archaeology of Printed Images, 2024-2026, I've been buying copperplates off second-hand markets: plates made to print newspapers and magazines, then dumped when the presses moved on. I clean them and print from them again, then rearrange what comes off.
Matter circulates. A plate vanishes, no record of it, nobody looking for it, and then it turns up on a market and goes back into use. Disappearance turns out to be a phase. That has changed how I think about preservation. An archive is built to stop things vanishing (obviously one of reasons). The plates say a thing can vanish and still come back, altered.
A plate is an archival body. It holds the image in reverse and outlives the paper it printed.
Yimin Xiang
Is there a material, image, object or gesture in the work that feels central to you?
Printing plates. A plate is an archival body. It holds the image in reverse and outlives the paper it printed. It keeps every scratch it picked up from handling, and because it can be scraped down and polished, it keeps a record of its own erasures. The plate is the document, and the print is the record.


Do you see the work as resisting being fixed or explained, or is the archive part of the work itself?
Resisting, mostly. Though the split is a bit false: the archive isn't a container. It's the condition I work in, and it isn't neutral, filing something already decides what it means. So I don't want the work explained all the way down. A piece that can be summarised has been catalogued, and the looking stops. Printmaking is how I slow that down; a printed image takes time to make and asks for time back. Something still ticking is better than something solved.
About the artist
Yimin Xiang is an artist and researcher currently completing a PhD at the Glasgow School of Art. His research investigates the intersections of printmaking, archival theory, and contemporary visual culture.
Artwork© Yimin XiangPhotographyRachel Deakin (MIMA); Oli Cowling (South London Gallery)EditionFuture Archives — London, print edition · Order
Continue reading
-
Paul Majek: Losing a Home
Layered paintings, sculptural installations and personal archives: Paul Majek on displacement, memory and belonging — where physical absence converges with inner dislocation.
-
Makiko Harris: A Needle Mends and It Pierces
A sewing needle mends and it pierces. Makiko Harris on intimacy as the most powerful force there is, objects that carry contradictory meanings, and…
-
What Survives the Machine: Tony Raven on Knowledge, Trust and the Digital Dark Age
Tony Raven, former Chief Executive of Cambridge Enterprise, talks about tacit knowledge, the fragility of digital memory, AI and the people and institutions that…



